Economist Diane Coyle argues that debates over AI’s economic impact focus almost exclusively on paid employment while overlooking a potentially larger effect: reducing the time people spend on unpaid household administrative work, such as dealing with bureaucracy and paperwork. She notes that despite tools like the American Time Use Survey, most OECD countries collect limited data on how people spend time outside paid work, leaving this potential productivity gain and its implications for genuine leisure time largely unmeasured and absent from policy debate.